IBC Case Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Holding vs. Subsidiary Asset Ownership (2024)
IBC Case Law: BRS Ventures Investments Ltd. (Appellant) Versus SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd. & Anr. (Respondents) ; Supreme Court of India Civil Appeal No. 4565 of 2021 2024 INSC 548
Issue of Conflict: Holding Company is not the owner of the assets of its Subsidiary. Therefore, the assets of the Subsidiaries cannot be included in the Resolution Plan of the Holding Company.
Brief Facts:
Gujarat Hydrocarbon and Power SEZ Limited, is a corporate debtor. The corporate debtor approached the 1st respondent–SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited (the financial creditor), for a grant of a loan. Under the agreement dated 5th January 2011, the financial creditor granted the corporate debtor a loan of Rs.100 crores for setting up a SEZ project. The corporate debtor is a subsidiary of M/s. Assam Company India Limited (ACIL). The loan granted by the financial creditor to the corporate debtor was secured by a mortgage made by the corporate debtor of its leasehold land and a pledge of shares of the corporate debtor and ACIL. The loan was also secured by the corporate guarantee dated 5thJanuary 2011 furnished by ACIL. The financial creditor filed an Original Application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Kolkata (for short, ‘the DRT’) to recover the outstanding loan amount. On 24th March 2015, a “debt repayment and settlement agreement” was executed to which the financial creditor, the corporate debtor and ACIL (the guarantor) were parties. On account of the default committed by the corporate debtor, the financial creditor invoked the corporate guarantee of ACIL. Thereafter, an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short, ‘the IBC’) was filed concerning ACIL as the guarantee was not honored.
Judgement:
Hon’ble Supreme Court summarized some of its conclusions as under:
a. Payment of the sum of Rs.38.87 crores to the 1st respondent-financial creditor under the resolution plan of the corporate guarantor-ACIL will not extinguish the liability of the 2nd respondent principal borrower/corporate debtor to pay the entire amount payable under the loan transaction after deducting the amount paid on behalf of the corporate guarantor in terms of its resolution plan;
b. A holding company is not the owner of the assets of its subsidiary. Therefore, the assets of the subsidiaries cannot be included in the resolution plan of the holding company, and
c. The financial creditor can always file separate applications under Section 7 of the IBC against the corporate debtor and the corporate guarantor. The applications can be filed simultaneously as well.
For details: https://lnkd.in/gCUcCSAp
Looking to register a trademark? Contact VMK Professionals today! Our expert team can guide you through the entire trademark registration process, ensuring your brand’s protection and compliance with all legal requirements. We offer personalized support tailored to your specific needs. Get in touch with us now to secure your brand’s future!